More a warm coming from Twitter.
Our dear Rosana Hermann noticed a detail - nonsense, tell by the way - to save an image of the ego blog, aimed at SPFW.
Here the post:

Now, right click and save the image, look at the name chosen for the personal photo blog:
The end, ugly, ridiculous and UO ³.
slowpoke blogger ...
Have they changed the name of the photo to "estilo.jpg"
http://www.spfw0708.globolog.com.br/estilo.jpg
But the "bichinhas.jpg" still there:
http://www.spfw0708.globolog.com.br/bichinhas.jpg
Does it show that the picture has gone through a photoshop too. One is lighter than the other.
hahahaha, like that is not C *. Each one has its own. In return we have: Respect is good and preserves teeth.
Moreover, now they have changed. is "estilo.jpeg" hahahaha
is changed.
affffffff without comment! globo.com tava as gay in a business like this!
flw hugs!
an intern some more haha
Dani, gives a lidinha here:
http://www.isfree.tv/site/controleremoto_post.php?post=581&pg=1
Post dated 18/01/2008
Kisses.
LOOK AT THE PREJUDICE AGAINST THE TRAINEES!
But that's it! Algn q is a BLOG can not commit that kind of shit. Tug-of-the-ear deserved. Never thought that something was needed in the blogosphere. Why not call the photo "emos", "neo-giving", "teen-new_wave", "long-qndo-beatles-is-70-year ?"??? Anyway, w / d so many ways to make fun of those surveyed - did the q d KINDNESS talk w / her - all the worst d was chosen.
Regardless of the name they chose pras figures (actually it was pejorative), I still think they hurt ... 5 of ugly rock-glam-punk-retro? Let some punk really, if they exist, know this ... I miss Bob Spit!
Ah go ..
Look at this picture! These folks did promise to be bullied!
Memo that has crunk!
AHuAHuahUahUAhUA
PS: Name the photo as "emos" gave the same! xD
It is the height of political correctness. Nine out of ten would say exactly that: sissies, Anonymous and other such ine.
This shit will transform policing still all a bunch of idiots scared of sending their own opinion.
It all translates into a lack of respect for the individuality of each. If they give, give what is theirs, right?