Geez, put it fail. Have the number of guests and do not cross with the number of seats is something that explains any amateurism is stupid ... plain and simple. Unfortunately stain the entire production right? = /

and we also witnessed the confusion, a pity

Putz ... Production amateur until a few hours. Damn shame. It is essential that anyone who stayed on the ground would be happy. No wonder many people are boycotting the film after learning about the confusion.

people always forget that there are people who will not acknowledge and to those working with it knows that you always have to put more ... but really, it was a shame what happened

Hi Dani! Q Pull the skirt, huh? Just any night.
I love your posts! Sorry have never commented before. Motivated by our Blogcamps life this year I'm blogging too!! hehe get it! bjão

Poa, but when you do not roll these promotional contract with clauses or the like? It seems that everything is matched by the phone, kind of campaign promises.

There must be a contract and, most importantly, must be read and then if something happens, to take the appropriate action. Or do you think some of the organizers are worried about what you wrote here? For them it is just another tatibitati

Place ham in it.

It's amazing how one is able direction of a Pixar movie or put it on high without even the spectators have seen the same.

Now, I will do it just with bloggers, whose power and reach in the media is so great?

NOTE ZERO!

[...] Sit down! Come on, people! The movie is about to begin! "As recorded the Dani, Blog Oh! Tri eh! | Tags: cabral, cinema, couch, Lilia, national premiere You can follow [...]

caraio .... the river was so tb

ops ... I typed wrong. the river was not so ... it was quiet!

Dani is that there has to kick the bucket, I bet if this post will not arrive until the film's self-ranking and that someone must be blamed

Hi Dani.
We were responsible for yesterday's session at the cinema Arteplex Diwan SP. Nice to leave here recorded two important information that we can to try to take some of this bad impression you got from the session. The confirmation of the number of people we had until the session was less than the number of seats for the event. Actually drawn by some blogs appeared on time, leaving us no choice as the room we were provided by the exhibitor hall was the seventh with 102 seats. We tried to negotiate a change room at the time, but there was no way around, as some tickets from other sessions of the other rooms had been sold. Really annoying to have to suggest that some people sit on the ground, but rather try to avoid it before, with the indication in the report about the session (virtual call) that said the session was "subject to the room size." We will in several other cities including SP. You are our guest, as well as participants of its promotion that failed to watch the movie. We would appear that ... Even to undo the impression that bad. ... I really do not want it ... Not to the movies, not for the movie and even to such events that are likely to happen, even in several surrounding care, as we always do. Thank you for your attention and please, if we find it interesting to flag a session shortly after the carnival.
-

Sincerely,
Core Team idea
Social Media

That is, blogs are invited to last on the priority list huhauahu
There seemed a good "fix" this comment. Oo

"Now, I will do it just with bloggers, whose power and reach in the media is so great?"

So much power that not received actual ticket and still sat on the floor ...

The situation becomes comical. Just look for the details.

First, the fact: the organization has failed and that is indisputable. If the job had actually planned an appropriate, there would be differences on how people were invited.

Second, "subject to the room size" between us, you believe that anyone - business or sane person - would organize an event that really could have problems with "stocking room" inviting, among other figures, opinion leaders with wide range of diffusion of their messages? I sincerely believe in Santa Claus, but this hypothesis can not believe - or I can not imagine such a precarious mental.

Third, "sitting on top: See the most critical point. The mistake was made. And point. In this situation, would be consistent, at least, apologize for the failure and if there was a plausible, present it to those who suffered "in the flesh" the consequences of error. Now, it's ridiculous to try to get around this problem of shifting the blame to people who were invited to attend the event and that "there is properly informed." It's the end.

Therefore I think and I conclude: there is patience with amateurish.

The situation becomes comical. Just look for the details.

First, the fact: the organization has failed and that is indisputable. If the job had actually planned an appropriate, there would be differences on how people were invited.

Second, "subject to the room size" between us, you believe that anyone - business or sane person - would organize an event that really could have problems with "stocking room" inviting, among other figures, opinion leaders with wide range of diffusion of their messages? I sincerely believe in Santa Claus, but this hypothesis can not believe - or I can not imagine such a precarious mental.

Third, "sitting on top: See the most critical point. The mistake was made. And point. In this situation, would be consistent, at least, apologize for the failure and if there was a plausible, present it to those who suffered "in the flesh" the consequences of error. Now, it's ridiculous to try to get around this problem of shifting the blame to people who were invited to attend the event and that "there is properly informed." It's the end.

Therefore I think and I conclude: there is so much patience for ignorance.

[...] Fiasqueira pre film "Divan" in SP - Ah Tri Né! [...]